Google claims "Huawei sanctions, not good for security"
What the US government put forward as a reason for Huawei sanctions was a "national security threat". But it is said that Google continues to provide services to Huawei, which is claimed to be more beneficial to national security.
Google has also said that if it stops trading with Huawei, the Android ecosystem may split into two, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday.
The allegations are reported to have come from discussions with the US government. Hu told reporters that the sanctions would have a negative impact on national security.
Google has asked Pyongyang to exclude Huawei from its list of prohibited traders based on this logic, the Pyananathan Times said.
The US Department of Commerce selected Huawei as a trading limited company last month. Accordingly, US companies must obtain government approval in order to deal with Huawei.
Google also said it will suspend update services for Huawei following the Commerce Department's measures.
However, the Financial Times reported that it made little difference in the process of negotiations with the US government until the measure came out.
"Huawei is now dependent on Google to use Android software," Google said in a statement. "This dependency is more beneficial to the United States."
Google also warned that if you stop trading with Huawei, the Android operating system may split into two types. One is the real Android that Google provides, and the other is the hybrid version.
Among them, Google claims that the hybrid version of Android is likely to contain more errors than Google's operating system. If this happens, Huawei smartphones will be more likely to be hacked.
According to the Financial Times, Google said "more secure devices are more helpful for national security.
In addition to these claims, the Financial Times said that the sanctions against Huawei could harm Google's monopoly over Android.
If Google discontinues services for Huawei, Google may claim to create its own Android operating system based on open source content.
0 comments:
Post a Comment